Here’s a thought for you. Some O&G production companies don’t like their former staff coming back and interfacing with their current workforces for a number of reasons:
- morale: staffer is doing the same (or less!) work for more pay.
- dilemma: would a recently departed staff member be as loyal to the project, she’s already shown a tendency to grab opportunities regardless of timing.
And I guess it would be logical that the longer the time between departure and returning to the ex-employer fold, the less the pain of reconciliation.
In addition, there have been discussions in the past about production companies (aka PSCs) pinching staff from each other.
Now, PETRONAS / PCSB has tentacles into all PSCs in Malaysia. If there is such a policy, doesn’t that mean that any staff who leave PNAS are discriminated against when applying for work with a production company? Sure, they could apply to work with the service providers, but I would think that really isn’t where their strengths lie.
So, what do you do? Some staffers join a ‘stop gap’ company to reset their CVs as it were before working for (notice I didn’t say applying to) a PSC.
Another option is to get out of Malaysia altogether. If you agree to the above logic, or a variant of, you would stop wondering why PNAS staff go overseas once they decide to leave the ship. There’s a push and pull factor involved here.