Continuing on the same topic above, a presentation was delivered by Damain Peake, Sr Technical Safety Engineer, Shell E&P Asia Pacific entitled ‘Shell – Asia Pacific (EPA) operationalises HSE cases: major hazards communication and technical integrity’
- Shell E&P AP portfolio.
- Asset Integrity – Definitions
- Technical Integrity – Definitions
- Introduction to Safety Cases
- Show all that hazards with the potential to cause a major accident have been identified, their risks have been evaluated and measures have been taken to control them.
- Issues
- Focus: SC used to capture all hazards, not just causes of major accidents.
- Usability: SC unwieldy due to too much info.
- Upkeep of SC, Management of Change (MOC)
- Consistency of SC structure.
- Framework to address Issues
- Operationalise Shell E&P AP SCs.
- Operating envelope and SC agreement
- Institute maintenance schedule
- MAH identified
- Compliance to ALARP principles
- Accountability
- Remedial action plan and progress tracking
- SC HSE section structure
- Overview
- Major Accident Hazards (MAH)
- Equipment
- Systems
- Additional information
- Best Practices
- MAH and assessments
- Best Practice Bow Tie – templates, electronically distributed and linked.
- Hazard / Safety Critical Element (SCE) communication
- Hazard control sheets.
- Major accident pictures.
- KPIs.
- SCE and technical integrity
- Change from facility description to SCE description
- Describe how to keep the SCE operating.
- Clear guidelines on how to manage SCEs when not fully functional.
- MAH and assessments
- Take home messages
- Process safety – asset integrity (AI) intrinsically linked.
- In operations, MAH management can only be ensured if technical integrity is ensured.
- Operations HSE case have 3 main functions: communication, linkages, …
- HSE lose focus.

can tell me the failure that can happen for the NGV vehicle. in tank,pipeline,or in engine.